Inside Friday’s Legislative Roundtable: what members raised, and what happens next

On the morning of Friday, October 23, 2026, in Annapolis, MSATP members spent two hours at a single table with six members of the Maryland General Assembly and senior leadership from the Comptroller’s Office. No slides, no podium, no panel — practitioners talking, lawmakers listening.

Who joined us

From the General Assembly: Delegate Jheanelle Wilkins, Chair of House Ways and Means; Delegate Jessica Feldmark, Vice Chair; Senator Brian Feldman; Delegate Kris Valderrama; Delegate Julie Palakovich Carr; and Delegate Caylin Young.

From the Comptroller of Maryland: Chief Deputy Comptroller Erica Roach, Legal Division Director Debora Gorman, and State Government Affairs Director Matthew Dudzic.

Making the Comptroller’s Office easier to work with

A substantial part of the morning went to practical, unglamorous problems:

  • Improving the customer experience when a practitioner contacts the office
  • Making submissions simpler on the preparer’s end
  • Fixing the process when an incorrect notice goes out
  • MSATP’s readiness to support the Comptroller’s budget request for additional staff

That last item deserves emphasis. Adequate staffing is the foundation for nearly every service improvement discussed on Friday, and MSATP is prepared to say so publicly when the budget is debated.

The backdrop: a budget gap, and the tax conversation that follows

Much of Friday’s discussion was shaped by a single fact — Maryland is facing a significant budget shortfall.

As of June, the Department of Legislative Services projected a structural gap of nearly $2.6 billion for fiscal 2028, while the Department of Budget and Management has been working from a figure closer to $3 billion. Projections for the two years after that run to roughly $3.4 billion each. Agencies have been asked to model reductions of about 3%, and two dozen Cabinet-level agencies were asked to outline cuts of up to 10%.

Cuts alone are unlikely to close a gap that size. House Appropriations Chair Ben Barnes has said “all options are on the table,” and the revenue options being discussed publicly are substantial — raising the sales tax from 6% to 7% would generate roughly $1.2 billion on its own.

For our members, that means new taxes and rate increases are very likely to be in question during the 2027 session. MSATP will be monitoring the budget and revenue debate closely and advocating for our members and their clients at every stage. The two conversations below are where that work begins.

Data centers and who pays their share

Members and legislators discussed how data centers should contribute to state and local revenue — particularly in places like Frederick County that have become an epicenter for development.

The mechanics matter. Frederick County has authority to levy a blanket business personal property tax but chooses not to, and the limited personal property it does tax doesn’t reach data centers. Taxing data center equipment therefore requires a change in state law — and the question is how to do it without pulling Frederick County’s small businesses into a tax they don’t pay today.

Last session’s answer was SB 427 and its cross-file HB 1595, which would have let counties and Baltimore City create a separate personal property subclass for qualified data centers and set a distinct rate for it. A subclass is exactly the tool that taxes data center equipment while leaving small business equipment alone. The bill was heard in Senate Budget and Taxation on February 18 and did not pass. Frederick County has estimated that a data center personal property tax at $1.80 to $2 per $100 of assessed value would generate roughly $67 million to $74 million annually.

Also worth knowing: under Chapter 640 of 2020, qualified data centers are already exempt from Maryland sales and use tax on qualifying personal property — the thresholds are $5 million in investment and five qualified positions within three years — and that same law lets local governments reduce or eliminate the assessment percentage on data center personal property. Ten data centers have been approved under the program so far.

Keeping professional services out of any tax expansion

Members made one point unmistakably clear: if new taxes or rate increases are on the table in 2027, professional services — tax preparation, accounting, bookkeeping — must stay out of them.

There is precedent to protect. The 2025 Budget Reconciliation and Financing Act imposed a 3% sales and use tax on data and information technology services effective July 1, 2025, reaching NAICS sectors 518, 519, 5132 and 5415. Accounting, tax preparation, bookkeeping and payroll services — NAICS 5412 — were not included.

That line held once. The argument for holding it again is simple: every Marylander has a legal obligation to comply with the tax laws, and the state should not tax the act of getting help to meet it.

What happens next

After the event, Delegate Palakovich Carr approached MSATP leadership to ask for a continuing conversation about expanding Maryland’s Offer in Compromise program as she prepares for the 2027 session.

That is what a successful roundtable produces. Not a thank-you note — a legislator asking for practitioner expertise while there is still time to shape a bill.

From now through the close of the 2027 session, MSATP will be tracking tax legislation as it is introduced and moves through committee, and we will be ready to support or oppose it on your behalf. Where a bill would make compliance simpler or fairer for Maryland taxpayers and the practitioners who serve them, we will say so — in writing, in person, and in the conversations that happen before a bill is ever drafted. Where a bill would add cost, complexity, or administrative burden without a corresponding benefit, we will say that just as plainly.

We will keep members posted as bills move, so you always know where your association stands and can add your own voice when it matters most.

Help us keep the seat at the table

Friday happened because MSATP has spent years building these relationships. The MSATP PAC is part of how we sustain them and keep practitioners in the room when Maryland tax policy gets written. If the morning mattered to you, a contribution of any size is the most direct way to say so.

DONATE TO THE MSATP PAC HERE

Thank you to everyone who gave up a Friday morning in October.

A New Path Forward: How Senate Bill 34 Could Expand CPA Licensure in Maryland

The Maryland Society of Accounting and Tax Professionals (MSATP) is proud to support Senate Bill 34, proposed legislation that would modernize CPA licensure in Maryland by creating an additional pathway to earning the CPA credential. We are pleased to partner with the Maryland Association of CPAs (MACPA) in advocating for this important step forward for the profession.

As the accounting and tax landscape continues to evolve, Maryland—like many states across the country—is facing a shrinking CPA pipeline alongside increasing demand for qualified professionals. Senate Bill 34 reflects a thoughtful, balanced response to this challenge: one that expands access without compromising professional standards or public trust.

Preserving Standards While Expanding Opportunity

Importantly, Senate Bill 34 does not eliminate or weaken Maryland’s existing CPA licensure requirements. The current pathways remain fully intact, including:

  • A master’s degree in accounting, or
  • A bachelor’s degree with an accounting concentration plus 30 additional college-level credit hours

Both of these existing options continue to require successful completion of the CPA exam and at least one year of relevant professional experience.

What SB 34 does is add a third, experience-based pathway. Under this option, candidates could qualify for CPA licensure by:

  • Completing a bachelor’s degree with an accounting or business concentration
  • Passing the CPA exam
  • Completing two years of qualifying, supervised professional experience

This pathway recognizes the value of real-world experience and provides an alternative for capable professionals who may be deterred by the cost or time associated with earning additional academic credits beyond a bachelor’s degree.

Advancing DEI Through Fairer Access to the Profession

The traditional 150-hour requirement can create financial and logistical hurdles for many aspiring CPAs. Emerging research suggests that extended educational demands have inadvertently made licensure less accessible to professionals from underrepresented groups, who may already face systemic barriers in education and career progression.

By offering a third pathway centered on professional experience, the bill helps remove one of the structural obstacles that have historically limited entry into the profession. This matters because a more diverse accounting community benefits clients, firms, and the broader business environment — diversity improves problem-solving, strengthens trust, and makes the profession more reflective of the communities we serve.

Why MSATP Supports This Bill

From MSATP’s perspective, Senate Bill 34 addresses several critical needs facing Maryland’s accounting community:

  • Expanding the talent pipeline by welcoming diverse educational and career backgrounds
  • Reducing financial and structural barriers for students and career changers
  • Supporting employers, especially small and mid-sized firms, who are struggling to recruit and retain qualified professionals
  • Keeping Maryland competitive as other states adopt similar licensure reforms

By broadening access while maintaining rigorous experience and examination requirements, SB 34 strikes a responsible balance between flexibility and integrity.

A Collaborative Effort for the Profession

MSATP believes strongly that the future of the profession is best shaped through collaboration. Our partnership with MACPA on this legislation reflects a shared commitment to strengthening the CPA pipeline, protecting the public, and ensuring that Maryland remains a welcoming and forward-thinking place to build a career in accounting.

As the 2026 legislative session begins, MSATP will remain actively engaged in advocacy efforts on Senate Bill 34 and other policies affecting tax and accounting professionals across the state.

To follow legislation we’re monitoring, learn where MSATP stands on key issues, and see how you can get involved, visit our advocacy hub.


Track our 2026 Advocacy efforts here:
👉 https://msatp.org/advocating-for-you/

Legislative Breakfast: Bringing Practitioners and Policymakers to the Same Table

As Maryland’s legislative session approaches, the Maryland Society of Accounting and Tax Professionals recently hosted its annual Legislative Breakfast, creating space for meaningful conversation between tax and accounting professionals and state policymakers.

The breakfast brought together practitioners from across the state alongside Maryland Delegates and Senators, as well as leadership from the Comptroller of Maryland. The gathering provided an opportunity for open dialogue on the real-world impact of tax policy, administrative challenges, and the importance of thoughtful, practical legislation.

More than just an event, the Legislative Breakfast serves as a reminder that effective policy is built through education, collaboration, and direct engagement with those who work with Maryland’s tax system every day.

Why the Legislative Breakfast Matters

Tax and accounting professionals are often the first to see how legislation and administrative decisions affect small businesses, families, and communities. The Legislative Breakfast creates a nonpartisan space where those frontline perspectives can be shared directly with lawmakers and agency leadership.

These conversations help:

  • Provide legislators and agency leaders with real-world insight into tax administration and compliance challenges

  • Elevate practitioner perspectives on how policy decisions affect taxpayers and small businesses

  • Build relationships that support ongoing dialogue throughout the legislative session

  • Reinforce the role of trusted professionals in protecting taxpayers and strengthening Maryland’s tax system

A Focus on Education and Collaboration

The tone of the morning was collaborative and solutions-focused. Discussions emphasized system improvements, clearer communication, and the importance of considering both administrative feasibility and taxpayer impact when shaping policy. By convening practitioners, legislators, and the Comptroller’s leadership in the same room, MSATP continues to serve as a bridge between the profession and those responsible for administering and overseeing Maryland’s tax laws.

Supporting the Work Ahead

Events like the Legislative Breakfast are just one part of how the profession stays engaged throughout the legislative session. Ongoing education, access, and relationship-building require sustained effort.

Members who wish to further support this work may consider contributing to the Maryland Society of Accounting and Tax Professionals’ Political Action Committee (MSATP PAC). The MSATP PAC supports nonpartisan engagement with policymakers and ensures that the voice of ethical, practicing professionals continues to be heard in Annapolis.

Participation in the MSATP PAC is entirely voluntary and separate from MSATP membership dues. Contributions are not tax-deductible and are used in accordance with Maryland campaign finance laws.

As the session gets underway, MSATP remains committed to staying engaged, informed, and present on behalf of the profession. Thank you to everyone who attended the Legislative Breakfast and contributed to a productive and meaningful conversation.

Together, we continue to strengthen our professional community and the systems that serve Maryland taxpayers.

 

MSATP Takes Stand Against Proposed Tax on Accounting Services

March 15, 2025

This week, MSATP Executive Director Giavante’ Hawkins testified before both the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee in opposition to House Bill 1554 and Senate Bill 1045, which would impose a new 2.5% sales tax on accounting and tax services provided to business entities.

Our Message to Legislators

In testimony before both committees, Hawkins emphasized the devastating impact this legislation would have on Maryland’s accounting professionals and the businesses they serve.

“This legislation would devastate small accounting practices throughout Maryland, most of which are small businesses themselves operating on thin margins,” Hawkins testified. “These firms would face an impossible choice: absorb the tax and further reduce already slim profit margins, or pass the tax to clients and risk losing them to larger firms or out-of-state providers.”

A key point in our testimony was the cross-border disadvantage this would create for Maryland accounting professionals. As Hawkins explained to the committees, “A business in Western Maryland could easily drive 20 minutes to Pennsylvania and establish a relationship with an accountant there, completely bypassing this tax. This places Maryland accounting professionals at a severe competitive disadvantage.”

Inequitable Treatment

Our testimony also highlighted the inexplicable disparity in how the bill treats different professional services.

“While accounting services under NAICS code 5412 are specifically targeted, legal services under NAICS code 5411 are conspicuously absent from the list of taxable services,” noted Hawkins. “This selective approach would apply the tax to approximately 188,917 accounting, tax preparation, and bookkeeping businesses while exempting approximately 359,026 legal service businesses.”

This inequitable treatment is particularly problematic since some legal service providers also offer tax services but would remain exempt under the proposed legislation.

Taxing Mandatory Compliance

Perhaps most concerning is that this bill would create a “tax on a tax” by increasing costs for services that are essential for compliance with mandatory tax filing requirements.

“Filing tax returns is not optional – it is required by law,” Hawkins emphasized. “We should not be increasing fees for those who choose to hire a tax preparer to ensure they are in compliance with tax laws.”

The Fight Continues

While we appreciate the opportunity to testify, the fight is far from over. MSATP is continuing our advocacy efforts by reaching out to individual legislators and committee members.

“We are asking that if this bill moves forward, tax and accounting services be removed from the list of taxable services,” says Hawkins. “None of our neighboring states – Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia, or Virginia – impose sales tax on accounting and tax preparation services. This would place Maryland tax professionals at a severe competitive disadvantage.”

How Members Can Help

MSATP members can support our efforts by:

  1. Contacting your local representatives to express your concerns
  2. Sharing the potential impact on your practice and clients
  3. Emphasizing that this tax would harm compliance efforts and potentially reduce state revenue

We have prepared template letters that members can use when contacting legislators. These are available in the members-only section of our website.

We will continue to keep members updated as these bills progress through the legislative process. Your voice matters in this important fight for our profession and the businesses we serve throughout Maryland.


The Maryland Society of Accounting and Tax Professionals represents over 2,000 tax and accounting professional members who serve more than 700,000 Maryland residents.

Maryland Society of Accounting and Tax Professionals Champions CPA Mobility Through Senate Bill 51

The Maryland Society of Accounting and Tax Professionals (MSATP) took a strong stance on advancing the accounting profession as representatives testified before the Senate Education, Energy, and the Environment Committee on January 30, 2025, advocating for Senate Bill 51. This important legislation aims to streamline CPA mobility requirements, making it easier for qualified CPAs from other states to practice in Maryland.

MSATP Executive Director Giavante’ Hawkins testified alongside MACPA leadership and bill sponsor Senator Ellis, reinforcing the organization’s strong commitment to modernizing Maryland’s CPA practice privileges. Senate Bill 51 seeks to streamline reciprocal licensing requirements, aligning them with the universal standard of passing the Uniform CPA Examination, rather than imposing additional state-specific verifications. This change aims to enhance CPA mobility, reduce unnecessary barriers, and ensure consistency in professional licensing.

Why This Matters Now More Than Ever

The accounting profession is at a critical juncture. As states begin to reevaluate the traditional 150-hour education requirement for CPA licensure, mobility reform becomes increasingly important. These changes reflect growing recognition that rigid educational requirements may create unnecessary barriers to entry while not necessarily enhancing professional competency.

Maryland’s SB51 aligns with this national momentum toward modernizing CPA requirements. By focusing on the Uniform CPA Exam as the key qualification metric, rather than varying state-specific requirements, the bill acknowledges that professional competency can be demonstrated through standardized testing and practical experience.

Key Changes Proposed by SB51

The legislation would modify current requirements by:

  • Recognizing CPAs licensed in other states who have passed the Uniform CPA Examination
  • Eliminating the need for NASBA verification of state requirements
  • Maintaining strong professional standards while reducing bureaucratic barriers

Impact on the Profession

This reform comes at a crucial time when the accounting industry faces:

  • A growing shortage of CPAs nationwide
  • Increasing demand for cross-state services in our digital economy
  • Evolution in educational approaches to professional qualification
  • Need for greater workforce mobility and flexibility

The bill preserves critical consumer protections by requiring out-of-state CPAs to:

  • Submit to Maryland Board jurisdiction
  • Comply with state regulations
  • Cease practice if their home state license becomes invalid

MSATP remains committed to supporting legislation that enhances professional mobility while protecting public interest. Senate Bill 51, scheduled to take effect October 1, 2025, represents a significant step toward modernizing CPA practice requirements while maintaining high professional standards.